Thu Jun 18 01:53:13 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dungeons of Daggerith: I'm totally new at all of this. I'm jsut a builder and a writer of books.
Thu Jun 18 01:58:31 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: I'd give you the codes if I knew what you needed. I have a shell email here but I dont' know the first thing about that stuff.
Thu Jun 18 01:59:04 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i think that given the information you've shared with me publicly and privately, your best bet is indeed to start over
Thu Jun 18 02:01:02 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: sucks, but it could be a fact i have to accept.
Thu Jun 18 02:01:17 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: it's not shameful to join someone else's project
Thu Jun 18 02:01:47 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: and I'm doing all of this freehand, without any prior knowledge. I'm still looking for a instructor in mudconnector.
Thu Jun 18 02:02:19 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i think that the best way to learn is to join an existing team
Thu Jun 18 02:02:34 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: your payment to them for helping you learn is your contribution to their mud
Thu Jun 18 02:02:41 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: that's usually how this sort of thing works
Thu Jun 18 02:03:26 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: I really like your code. But the only person that invited me in was on a MUX/MOO combination, and nothing like LPC.
Thu Jun 18 02:04:02 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: I fully agree. I guess I'll just have them shut this one down, and save my money.
Thu Jun 18 02:05:31 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Well, I might be willing to teach you the little I know. I could always use some company. Kind of learning myself, though.
Thu Jun 18 02:07:33 2009
[dchat]
Wolvesbane@Dead Souls Dev: even if it is only building rooms and minor things. Learning at the beginning is difficult but I'm more than happy to learn.
Thu Jun 18 02:08:13 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: My functional knowledge of the lib is rather limited as I've been mostly doing lib coding, but I can teach you LPC. At least the simpler parts.
Thu Jun 18 02:09:15 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Take a look at my thread in dead souls chat if you want to know both what kind of stupid mistakes I tend to make, and what my level of knowledge is like.
Thu Jun 18 02:09:57 2009
[dchat]
Taffyd@Discworld: One of my fellow admins, Drakkos, has written a large number of documents about MUDs and LPc. They're fairly Discworld specific in places, but you might want to read them anyway: http://www.monkeys-at-keyboards.com/
Thu Jun 18 02:10:59 2009
[dchat]
Taffyd@Discworld: although it looks like spam bots have cracked his forums;p
Thu Jun 18 02:14:25 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: 2 space indent... required { } block around a single statement...
Thu Jun 18 02:14:51 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@Discworld: because of the lack of EventCapitalizationMakesGreatUseOfSpaceWhenYouWantLongNames() ?
Thu Jun 18 02:15:21 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: I like using {}s around a single statement, personally.
Thu Jun 18 02:16:42 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: I use both, unfortunately. CamelCase for functions and under_scores for variables. Does that make me a bad person?
Thu Jun 18 02:18:34 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@Discworld: it's not about good or bad. it's about right and wrong.
Thu Jun 18 02:20:32 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Meh. As long as you don't go around indenting with two spaces :-)
Thu Jun 18 02:20:44 2009
[dchat]
Taffyd@Discworld: we have this ungoing holy war between 2, 3 and 4.
Thu Jun 18 02:20:50 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: I prefer tabs but I tend to accept them as a lost cause.
Thu Jun 18 02:21:14 2009
[dchat]
Silenus@Dead Souls Dev: actually i liek using a page of whitespace between adjacent tokens.
Thu Jun 18 02:21:17 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: If the world used tabs then we could all set our personal tab widths...
Thu Jun 18 02:22:09 2009
[dchat]
Silenus@Dead Souls Dev: it makes it so i can inflate my line counts without wasting ink if i want to print something out.
Thu Jun 18 02:24:16 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Hmm... what is that language that is all whitespace?
Thu Jun 18 02:24:47 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: You mean whitespace? The esoteric language that is entirely composed of spaces and tabs?
Thu Jun 18 02:24:53 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Ah. 'whitespace', strangely enough. Anyway, that saves ink...
Thu Jun 18 02:25:33 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: It would be hard to start an indent war over it, at least.
Thu Jun 18 03:30:07 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: so why is it, if I just loaded the dishwasher, that my kitchen is still such a wreck? Is there someone convenient to blame?
Thu Jun 18 16:02:22 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i think the new screenlock command should fix yer problem from yesterday
Thu Jun 18 16:03:30 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: I unchecked the NAWS box in zmud. since then not one resize.
Thu Jun 18 16:04:01 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: I really went crazy trying to make it happen. Im convinced its fixed.
Thu Jun 18 16:04:19 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: oww. already added to the env output too. fancy.
Thu Jun 18 20:36:44 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: yes, it is. it was the royalty-free replacement for gif.
Thu Jun 18 20:37:44 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: anybody here good at cracking into unix systems?
Thu Jun 18 20:38:23 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i'd like to ask them to white hat something for me
Thu Jun 18 20:40:18 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: white hat... next thing you know, someone has strapped some C4 into your computer case and have uploaded a virus that makes you itch to press the <delete> key.
Thu Jun 18 20:41:44 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: it lets you access things like terminals and stuff in yer browser
Thu Jun 18 20:42:03 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: basically letting yer browser be a term, but heres the beauty
Thu Jun 18 20:42:15 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: it can go thru proxies n stuff, cuz its ajax
Thu Jun 18 20:42:26 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: no additional connection, just the browser
Thu Jun 18 20:43:14 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: so i want osmeone to try to white hat crack it for me
Thu Jun 18 20:43:25 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: but i odnt wanna like, announce the thing to the world
Thu Jun 18 20:44:25 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: last time I knew anything about cracking systems was back before sun invented the term "Solaris"...
Thu Jun 18 20:44:52 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I was pretty good at hacking root on a SunOS box, though :p
Thu Jun 18 20:45:58 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: ha! with the latter being the equivalent of a toddler on a tricycle calling himself a "biker"?
Thu Jun 18 20:47:56 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: I can hack on a toddler on a tricycle on root.
Thu Jun 18 20:52:38 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: I just did. it is now catalogged and housed in the Library of Congress. er, at least on Tricky's server. hehe
Thu Jun 18 21:58:09 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: im grumpy. that thing was awesome but too insecure
Thu Jun 18 21:59:21 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: pretty much requires you to run telnet inside the host
Thu Jun 18 21:59:31 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: cuz u have to run telnet from inside the host
Thu Jun 18 21:59:44 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Well, yeah. Since Ajax can't run around making random tcp connections.
Thu Jun 18 21:59:52 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: all anyone has to do is figure out how to crack outside that
Thu Jun 18 22:00:47 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Hmm. I see the argument. Run it in a vm if you want to be paranoid? Then firewall the VM in an extremely restrictive way.
Thu Jun 18 22:01:06 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: I wish (maybe it does) iptables would let you firewall based on process UID.
Thu Jun 18 22:04:01 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Ooooh, it does! Therefore, assuming linux, you could use --uid-owner for iptables and do something like restrict the ajax server daemon to binding to a totally separate ip address.
Thu Jun 18 22:04:51 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: (I take it your main fear is something somewhere saying 127.0.0.1 is whitelisted)
Thu Jun 18 22:06:25 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: you run their daemon bound to some port. then you direct your browser to that server and port. the daemon then fires up whatever command you specified is to be fired up, and you have yourself a happy little term
Thu Jun 18 22:06:53 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: in the case of a mud, the command might be something like telnet localhost 6666 -e ""
Thu Jun 18 22:07:16 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: (the -e "" disables the escape, so people cant go total lame)
Thu Jun 18 22:07:49 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: but a given connection is limited to the command specified at start time by the daemon
Thu Jun 18 22:08:12 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: he will only fire up the command line i specified for that port
Thu Jun 18 22:08:35 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: sure you can run it with false shell and no homedit
Thu Jun 18 22:08:48 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: but do i really want randome joes showin up running commands inside my box
Thu Jun 18 22:09:37 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Uhh, if random joe can't pass parameters to the command, surely that isn't a problem?
Thu Jun 18 22:09:49 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: why don't you fix it? or write an ajax telnet app vfs an ajax shell app
Thu Jun 18 22:10:11 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: ideysus, in a world where no telnet servers ever got overflowed, there would be no prob
Thu Jun 18 22:10:18 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Unless I misunderstand and the command does not take static arguments.
Thu Jun 18 22:10:41 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i have to trust that the telnet program cant be cracked out of
Thu Jun 18 22:11:11 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: well no need to drop my pants ALL the way down
Thu Jun 18 22:12:09 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: I mean... chroot a netcat process or something... that is going to be far, far, far more secure than mudos here...
Thu Jun 18 22:12:31 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: yeah im thinking something with belt and suspenders, if i were to do it
Thu Jun 18 22:12:34 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: if it has soruce, rewrite it so that it uses a network socket instead of a terminal
Thu Jun 18 22:13:07 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: That way you eliminate the problem, and it can only connect to your session
Thu Jun 18 22:13:54 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: if it were a big enough problem to solve with money i'da already handled it
Thu Jun 18 22:14:43 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: If it is that great then just make some form of sandbox. VM.
Thu Jun 18 22:15:44 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: if im gonna recode something i'll prolly recode the java client im using to be less lame
Thu Jun 18 22:15:57 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: im not coding something to fix security problems i dont really understand
Thu Jun 18 22:16:44 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: The nice bit to ajax though is it will get around almost all firewalls.
Thu Jun 18 22:17:10 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Bah. If it is that great, why haven't you installed it in a VM yet?
Thu Jun 18 22:18:07 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: you think i want someone with a rooted vm in my host?
Thu Jun 18 22:18:27 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: I'll hack it to just use telnet directly if you ban Duuk.
Thu Jun 18 22:19:33 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: Okay. So first they have to overflow telnet and manage to get a local account. Then they have to do a privilege escalation to root in the VM. Then they have to find a flaw in the virtualisation software and break into the system itself.
Thu Jun 18 22:19:56 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: I see the argument. They only have to find 3 zero day flaws.
Thu Jun 18 22:20:08 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: did'nt the guy from hypervm just blow himself because of a vulnerabiluity in his VM software?
Thu Jun 18 22:22:52 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: How much effort would it take to hack it to use telnet?
Thu Jun 18 22:23:27 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: as to the flash app, i have a problem trusting the author
Thu Jun 18 22:23:44 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: and since i have trouble trustin gthe author, i have trouble trusting his compiled app
Thu Jun 18 22:27:06 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Hellmonger, you didn't answer my question: How much effort would it take to hack it to use telnet directly?
Thu Jun 18 22:27:36 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i musta missed somethin. hellmongers guna hack wut?
Thu Jun 18 22:28:04 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: "Hellmonger@Trilogy <dchat> I'll hack it to just use telnet directly if you ban Duuk." not sure if that was entirely a joke or not.
Thu Jun 18 22:28:49 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: musta been, i dont even know what he meant other than "ban duuk"
Thu Jun 18 22:28:59 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: But even if the process has its own telnet that is just as hackable. Probably more so since existing telnet applications are mature and security sensitive.
Thu Jun 18 22:29:43 2009
[dchat]
Ideysus@ShadowMUDii: See this cat 6 cable going into the box? Big hole.
Fri Jun 19 05:05:09 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Anyone know of a trick to keep an sftp connection from idling out? Nautilus does not like it when its connections idle out, apparently.
Fri Jun 19 05:24:29 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: How would that work? As I understand it would technically be a separate connection, right?
Fri Jun 19 05:27:06 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Hm. Not seeing anything in ssh_config. ConnectTimeout 0 means it shouldn't time out, right?
Fri Jun 19 05:29:09 2009
[dchat]
Tahin@Kar Unol: Well, that's interesting. I did a little googling and didn't turn anything up.
Fri Jun 19 05:29:32 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: bleeme, seen it half a dozen times, no exaggeration
Fri Jun 19 21:00:05 2009
[dchat]
Detah@Dead Souls Dev: well, this is the least chatter day in the history of ds, isnt it.
Sun Jun 21 01:38:22 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: and about 25% of them even have active people logged in, who talk in here from time to time.
Sun Jun 21 01:39:48 2009
[dchat]
Echnos@Dead_Souls_echnos: I need to get my name and whatnot out of the defaults
Sun Jun 21 02:59:52 2009
[dchat]
Haldir@The Land of Threlld: is it necessary to keep all the rooms that come with Dead Souls?
Sun Jun 21 03:01:44 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: http://dead-souls.net/ds-admin-faq.html#138
Sun Jun 21 18:15:42 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: hmmm. are electronics really not too sensitive to being fed the wrong voltage? I just discovered that my cable internet adapter wants 12V DC and it's attached to a power brick that supplies 9V DC.
Sun Jun 21 18:16:22 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: it prolly has a 5V or 3.3V stabiliser inside anyway.
Sun Jun 21 18:17:16 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: wouldnt surprise me if yer shortening its life
Sun Jun 21 18:17:37 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Still says webstar? heh, old one. Since two years they're Cisco.
Sun Jun 21 18:17:44 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: the cable company claims it's obsolete already anyway. Of course, their math is very suspect, but it'll certainly be obsolete soonish.
Sun Jun 21 18:17:57 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: ive found that electronics that arent fed what they want sometimes wind up bricking oddly later
Sun Jun 21 18:18:15 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: yeah, it's old, but it's MINE... paying a couple dollars a month to rent the newest model doesn't make sense.
Sun Jun 21 18:18:43 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: I've got DPC2100R2 myself, might be ugly but Just Works.
Sun Jun 21 18:19:00 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: especially since what the newest model gets me is from a theoretical 9mbps to 12 mbps. Since the cable is only 6mbps...
Sun Jun 21 18:19:50 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: bricking is no good. I'll be swapping out power adapters... just as soon as my wife finishes her game anyway. Cutting off the internet in the middle would probably get me in trouble!
Sun Jun 21 18:20:52 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: all this mystery began when I decided I wanted to try using my print server again... and couldn't find the adapter.
Sun Jun 21 18:21:15 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: after extensive searching through many boxes, it turns out it's powering the cable thing. feh.
Sun Jun 21 18:21:44 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Depends on how the power is routed internally... but usually it's input -> fuse -> voltage stabiliser -> rest of the electronics... and modern low dropout stabs work correctly with as small differences like 0.75V. Most digital electronics is 5V or below, so...
Sun Jun 21 18:22:26 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: prolly they use same model of power brick for other equipment too and that's why it's 12V.
Sun Jun 21 18:22:29 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: you know, none of this would be as complicated if we just had DC coming into the house.
Sun Jun 21 18:22:52 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Efficiency, Sir. DC dissipates/drops very easily.
Sun Jun 21 18:23:08 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I wasn't suggesting we do DC on the transmission lines.
Sun Jun 21 18:23:30 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: why not convert it at the pole or in the basement, though? And not have to have conversion in _every_ _single_ _device_
Sun Jun 21 18:23:36 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: And AC->DC conversion is extremely simple and cheap if done on the end.
Sun Jun 21 18:23:55 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Because it'd drop on that small distance from the basement to the socket already.
Sun Jun 21 18:24:36 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I'm not sure that's true. The final DC building in New York City was just converted recently. How did they deal with the drop?
Sun Jun 21 18:25:09 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: there is only a DC conversion where required, like in solid state stuff.
Sun Jun 21 18:25:18 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: your washing machine, your fans, your lightbulbs
Sun Jun 21 18:25:59 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: oh. you said, "your light bulbs". :P mine have tungsten in them.
Sun Jun 21 18:26:39 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: regardless, all of your heavy duty shit runs on AC, not DC
Sun Jun 21 18:26:51 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: i don't think i'm allowed to swear on this line
Sun Jun 21 18:27:26 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Well, really heavy duty stuff runs off 3-phase...
Sun Jun 21 18:28:09 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: could always have conversion in the basement, but not for all lines.
Sun Jun 21 18:29:33 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: when i build my compound, i'm going to have infrastructure for both ac and dc
Sun Jun 21 18:29:38 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: What'd you say about that: a powerstrip-style device with a ac->dc transformer and dozen of those round-pin low power plugs? Either in one unified voltage or with 15/12/9/5V zones?
Sun Jun 21 18:30:30 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: yeah. something like that! poof. no need for these dozens of bricks.
Sun Jun 21 18:31:39 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I mean, I was just looking and I have 6 bricks just under my desk. seems absurd.
Sun Jun 21 18:34:44 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/14/off-goes-the-power-current-started-by-thomas-edison/
Sun Jun 21 18:35:29 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: looks like basement or even power pole conversion could be realistic, if their "1 mile" statement is valid.
Sun Jun 21 18:38:27 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Agreed. Now, how do you imagine that from the technical side? Two parallel power systems in one building? You'd have to agree on unified voltage, obtain different sockets so there will be no confusion...
Sun Jun 21 18:39:39 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: well, forcing electronic makers to agree on a single voltage would be a good thing. If I remember right (and I'm certainly no expert), dropping voltages in DC is easier than converting from AC to DC.
Sun Jun 21 18:40:19 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: different sockets certainly. and, yes, two parallel systems. Sounds bad, but realistically most of us have at least three systems going in our houses anyway. What's the big deal of adding a 4th?
Sun Jun 21 18:40:24 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Yeah, you could eventually settle on 24VDC sockets, prolly. But that's a costly operation.
Sun Jun 21 18:41:16 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: I vote for endpoint conversion. No changes to existing installation, no additional cost.
Sun Jun 21 18:41:37 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: you mean with a SINGLE converter just on the other side of the wall, right?
Sun Jun 21 18:41:47 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Almost, just using ONE brick-ish transformer with many connectors.
Sun Jun 21 18:43:21 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: And believe me, i hate power bricks. I have one cable on the top of my desk because it was too short for normal way.
Sun Jun 21 18:47:23 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I wish the cords coming from my router weren't so heavy that the unbalanced the thing.
Sun Jun 21 18:49:09 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: mine is mounted on the wall sockets-down. They can't pull it any lower than it is.
Sun Jun 21 18:50:00 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: that sounds like a good idea. maybe I'll make a little stand for mine and screw it into the stand.
Sun Jun 21 19:06:27 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: oh, oh! I have the company motto already! "We Possessive That Which Others Without!"
Sun Jun 21 19:11:49 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: hmmm. If I can get people to start calling the outlets "HPCs", I might have something!
Sun Jun 21 19:16:11 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: and, well, per-socket adjustable voltage would add to the cost. But you could tap a few power busses from the transformer, and put socket on them. So, a row of 12V, ones, another of 5V... deifferent models might provide different amount of sockets with different Vs. Sounds like a great business opportunity.
Sun Jun 21 19:16:40 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: (plus the expensive adlustable Pro series).
Sun Jun 21 19:17:29 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: then I could go with a Basic Edition that prevents you from changing your wallpaper (or painting)
Sun Jun 21 19:18:17 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: now all I have to do is hire that Cham-WOW! guy to do the marketing.
Sun Jun 21 19:18:35 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: 'cause everybody loves a sleazy, poorly washed guy selling things.
Sun Jun 21 19:20:49 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns4mnmNBk1Y&feature=related
Sun Jun 21 19:23:35 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: Which means you have to tap the transformer before the rectifer
Sun Jun 21 19:24:12 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: which also means you need a rectifier for each unique voltage in use
Sun Jun 21 19:24:47 2009
[dchat]
Hellmonger@Trilogy: you could just take a high DC voltage and drop it down with resisters and regulators.
Sun Jun 21 19:29:41 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: I wanted to go to electronic engineering...
Sun Jun 21 19:29:58 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: but in the hindsight, i'd prolly get kicked out after first year.
Sun Jun 21 19:36:23 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: the idea has merit. I'm not the business-starting sort, though.
Mon Jun 22 04:20:01 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@Final Realms: although it's good to see that FR is sending again :P
Mon Jun 22 07:17:27 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: or did someone implement automatic router failover on FR?
Mon Jun 22 12:49:44 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: yeah, apparenty someone did. I'm none too thrilled with how well it functions, though
Mon Jun 22 12:52:00 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: sounds a good idea, but first we'll hae to pick which color and how long. might take a while.
Mon Jun 22 12:56:10 2009
[dchat]
Sys@BlackHole: a cosmic string of infinite length, I think they're black
Mon Jun 22 12:58:50 2009
[dchat]
Sys@BlackHole: I'm not sure if this helps http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9310262
Mon Jun 22 12:59:30 2009
[dchat]
Sys@BlackHole: "flux-flux scattering using a multi-sheeted formalism"
Mon Jun 22 13:00:40 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: see? "that turns quarks into leopards..." I knew there could be fun colors involved!
Mon Jun 22 14:00:47 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: hmm, what is the issue with FR and automatic router failover? From my observation it works, at least to the point that FR connected to *wpr when *i4 was down for a little bit a while ago.
Mon Jun 22 14:02:17 2009
[dchat]
Hamlet@WWC: I think when it gets to the end of its list, it gives up. permanently.
Mon Jun 22 16:11:25 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: hmm... anybody knows how much weight can be safely put on a lenovo M51 8142 desktop?
Mon Jun 22 16:15:01 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: See, those new-fangled "LCD" thingies are quite lightweight. But the only monitor i have free atm is a 20kg CRT.
Mon Jun 22 16:15:23 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: and i'm not sure if that case can handle it.
Mon Jun 22 16:15:30 2009
[dchat]
Sys@BlackHole: yeah it'll hold that, 'd say, proly take sittin gon which is ~80kg
Mon Jun 22 16:16:05 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: you could be directing the weight on an area ill suited for it
Mon Jun 22 16:16:28 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i actually have one of these Sun 21" monstrosities
Mon Jun 22 16:17:01 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i dont think i'd dare put it on a flat desktop pc
Mon Jun 22 16:17:30 2009
[dchat]
Sys@BlackHole: would sit on a sun pizza box no worries, moulded aluminium cases!"!!
Mon Jun 22 16:17:35 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: kHz is for Hsync, and not sure if 100 is much... it's about the value for 1280x1024 methinks.
Mon Jun 22 16:17:48 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Hz is vsync and the refresh rate you're usually talking about.
Mon Jun 22 16:18:14 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: which is all obviosuly totally on-topic with the weight question of course
Mon Jun 22 16:18:36 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: im sorry, that was harsh. i'm still in killmode from a recent troll thread
Mon Jun 22 16:18:51 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Nah, not your fault. I asked then drifted off topic.
Mon Jun 22 16:18:59 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: i should remember to flip the selector lever from kill to stun
Mon Jun 22 16:19:33 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Anyway, old desktops i saw have a thick metal bar in the center of the area. This one doesn't.
Mon Jun 22 16:20:03 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Then the stun setting will kill half of the targets and don't do anything to the other half.
Mon Jun 22 16:35:10 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
Mon Jun 22 16:36:37 2009
[dchat]
Cratylus@Dead Souls Dev: kali, yer a big important man in a big important company
Mon Jun 22 16:38:14 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Good websites don't use it to provide CONTENT.
Mon Jun 22 16:38:23 2009
[dchat]
Sinistrad@Dead Souls Dev: I totally read that as "big ignorant man"
Mon Jun 22 16:38:30 2009
[dchat]
Raudhrskal@Dead Souls Dev: Or provide an alternate version that works w/o.
Mon Jun 22 16:38:35 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: website uses javascript == website fails accessibility requirements.
Mon Jun 22 16:39:11 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: accessibility requirements? on the web? lol, who's gonna enforce that? the EU?
Mon Jun 22 16:39:14 2009
[dchat]
Sinistrad@Dead Souls Dev: Forgive me, but since when does Kali care about human beings?
Mon Jun 22 16:41:59 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: i don't think TIOBE is a government vendor :)
Mon Jun 22 16:43:02 2009
[dchat]
Sinistrad@Dead Souls Dev: Because there's no enforcement mechanism in place for this particular website. That's why it wouldn't.
Mon Jun 22 16:44:06 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: because not doing so makes whomever made it look ignorant and anti social for excluding people with dissabilities.
Mon Jun 22 16:44:49 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: it *requires* javascript, whatever server tech you use is completely irrelevant for that :)
Mon Jun 22 16:44:59 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: they probably hired some dumb kid to code it
Mon Jun 22 16:45:16 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: see, there are perfectly good functional reasons to require that, but his site doesn't have one, so what they do is ignorance.
Mon Jun 22 16:45:29 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: <noscript>This website requires JavaScript. <a href="spiderpage.html">Site Map</a></noscript>
Mon Jun 22 16:46:49 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: but i have to disagree with your previous assertion that javascript means it's not accessible... When I worked on MSN we had to be accessible per MS requirements and were able to do so even with client side generated content using javascript.
Mon Jun 22 16:47:17 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: in fact the streaming radio app was completely client side dynamic html
Mon Jun 22 16:47:23 2009
[dchat]
Aidil@GurbaHub: you won't be compatible with many screenreaders that way.
Mon Jun 22 16:47:31 2009
[dchat]
Kalinash@Fire and Ice: and accessible to all the screen readers available at that time
Mon Jun 22 16:49:03 2009
[dchat]
Sinistrad@Dead Souls Dev: I'm a little confused as to what the problem is. Most highly functional websites use Javascript somewhere -- even ones that have to meet accessibility requirements, like Hotmail. Screen readers are smart enough to read your hotmail.
Go to the top | Channel Index

